Re: Let's lie for orthodox science - was - challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone

nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in
news:jie7g1l1n8d33td0er4aubee1e8q5cd2sc@xxxxxxx:

>>You dishonestly cut the line to which I replied, to wit:
>>
>>>Given that Minnesota is in the USA and does not contain
>>>anywhere called Eureka
>>
>>HWL
>
>
> Do you think I am referring to Minnesota? This is a simple
> question.

Just like Doug I thought you were refering to Minnesota, it was
inferred in the way your wrote it, obviously there was a different
interpretation. However you also claimed there was a plethora of
archaeological evidence for norse activities due north of Minnesota,
and when you were pinned on the issue you backed down and resorted to
propoganda. If anyone here should be labeled a deceiver it is you.

> The next one will be "do you think I was referring to
> Minnesota".

More rhetoric. Not good debate form. You should have immediately
clarified your argument as soon as confusion was pointed out, instead
you start attacking those who corrected you. Your living up to your
anonymous nick.

Fruit doesn't fall far from the tree.
.

Relevant Pages
Loading