Re: furthering the irrelevant

In article <rth9g15dse6j28nffdv50tfgpipna86sac@xxxxxxx>,
nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Apparently on date Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:12:35 -0400, Horace LaBadie
> <hwlabadiejr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >Your repeated attempts to spin the original imprecision, which led to
> >the subsequent nastiness of your personal attacks, have not lessened the
> >impression that you were being cute with the language in order to
> >present some irrelevant speculation as though it were an insight about
> >Norse penetration of the interior of NA in the present day USA.
> >
> >But feel free to continue the irrelevancy and misrepresentation.
>
> R-I-G-H-T, so it was all a big trick for me to talk about how the Norse
> reached
> Minnesota.
>
> Glad you cleared that up, your "crackpots talking about norse in minnesota"
> algorithm is all working just fine and you managed to catch one - despite his
> clever attempt to appear to be talking about something else entirely.
>
> You can sleep safely in your bed, another crackpot discovered, successful
> again, until the next time you must find a crackpot to unmask, once the need
> becomes too pressing for you to resist, and you must find one, you just must.
>
> But you don't score points for finding the same one twice, so please would
> you
> kill file me so you don't accidently catch me deliberately talking about
> something that might almost be Norse in Minnesota, again? Thanks in advance.
>
> You don't need to reply with some "you snipped the bit where you lied, not
> me!"
> rubbish, just do the killfile bit and then don't bother to say "oh, you
> changed
> your address" or more lies like that, just get it right the first time,
> thanks.

You've convinced me -- you're totally clueless.

HWL
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: furthering the irrelevant
    ... your "crackpots talking about norse in minnesota" ... You can sleep safely in your bed, another crackpot discovered, successful ... your address" or more lies like that, just get it right the first time, thanks. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
    ... >>>evidence of Norse presence in the United States before Columbus. ... >> west as Minnesota, on the north american continent. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
    ... >as Minnesota, for which there is ample archaeological evidence? ... I'm talking about evidence that is "suggestive" of Norse penetration in the ... And what is the archaeological evidence ... Island extends to 91 or 92 west and you have to be at least that far west to ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
    ... >>>I take it that Reiersgord is suggesting the KRS might have been carved by Norse ... >>>near Labrador and then deposited in Minnesota later on? ... >such a stone over 1,000 miles to the wilds of Minnesota. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Loading