Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:56:06 GMT
nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in
news:4u3ag19c11vcmqne8jqh26vhmaoc2rjath@xxxxxxx:
>>ever. And _MY POINT_ was that after traveling 250 or 500 miles
>>west from baffin Island a logical person after reviewing what
>>was to the left and right of them, would conclude that further
>>expedition was to what end? More cold intolerable climate with
>>an inability to support pastoral herding. Do you see an
>>abundance of livestock on the islands west of baffin island.
>
> No. And that makes absolutely no difference at all.
I see, well, since logic doesn't apply to your rules of argument, I
see no further need to discuss this with you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- References:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Prev by Date: Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?
- Next by Date: Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
