Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone


nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:


> You won't actually address the facts because they prove you to be wrong.

You say that to Philip Deitiker. Philip Deitker called me a kook,
he called you a kook, you once called me a kook, as I recall,
and now I have at least a right to ask you a question. What exactly
did you mean when you wrote that the Norse have come as far west
as Minnesota, for which there is ample archaeological evidence?
Which place did they reach as far west as Minnesota? Perhpas the
mouthing of the Nelson River? And what is the archaeological evidence
for this? Please answer these two questions precisely, just giving
me one place as far west as Minnesota, and the evidence for just
that place. Kooks are trying to hypnotize their readers by spreading
a peackock fan of hundred issues. I don't ask for hundred or even
a dozen places, just for one single place as far west as Minnesota,
and the archaeological evidence for the pre-Columbian arrival of
Norse there. One place, one find. Or else I have one good on you ...

Franz Gnaedinger www.seshat.ch

.

Quantcast