Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:02:21 +1200
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:31:39 -0500, Tom McDonald
<tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Eric Stevens wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:56:06 GMT, Philip Deitiker
>> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in
>>>news:4u3ag19c11vcmqne8jqh26vhmaoc2rjath@xxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>ever. And _MY POINT_ was that after traveling 250 or 500 miles
>>>>>west from baffin Island a logical person after reviewing what
>>>>>was to the left and right of them, would conclude that further
>>>>>expedition was to what end? More cold intolerable climate with
>>>>>an inability to support pastoral herding. Do you see an
>>>>>abundance of livestock on the islands west of baffin island.
>>>>
>>>>No. And that makes absolutely no difference at all.
>>>
>>>I see, well, since logic doesn't apply to your rules of argument, I
>>>see no further need to discuss this with you.
>>
>>
>> Chicken! :-)
>>
>> In fact, what you are running away from is that nospam is not going to
>> be suckered into using your flawed logic as the basis of the
>> discussion.
>
> I've rather lost the thread, in all the cacophony. What
>discussion are we talking about?
I think that from talking about the norse getting as far west as
Minnesota he was saying )as inflamed PD) that:
Begin quote of Message-ID:
<3qj9g15ecp9j5pc9g80s3h5qnmurrbs1gv@xxxxxxx>
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
My figures, based on the saga records with references to disko bay,
baffin island (helluland) and the labrador coast (markland), and of
course "L'Anse aux Meadows" and the like, are:
Early voyages, 800 CE to 1000 CE (well, a tad earlier really):
Bergen to Shetland - 200 miles
Shetland to Faeroe - 200 miles
Faeroe to Iceland - 300 miles
Norway to Britain - 300 miles
Norway to Brest - 800 miles
Faroes to north of Iceland and Bergen to north of Iceland to
circumnavigate it
- 500 and 1,300 miles respectively.
Bergen into the Barents Sea - 1,100 miles.
Named voyages,
(1) Erik the Red, 985 CE Reykjavik to the eastern settlement in order
to settle
it = 1,000 miles
- example data - (surely nobody needs proof that Erik founds the
eastern settlement?)
(2) Bjarni Herjolfsson, 985 CE, Iceland to the eastern coast of NA,
north up the coast of Labrador and across to the eastern settlement =
2,400 miles - example data - http://tinyurl.com/8xpy8
(3) Leif Eriksson, 1000 CE, eastern settlement up the coast of
Greenland to Disko bay, across to Baffin Island, and south down the
Labrador coast and L'Anse aux Meadows = 2,200 miles
- example data - http://tinyurl.com/bcaer
(4) Thorfinn Karlsefni, 1005 CE, Iceland around Greenland all the way
to Disko Bay, and then down the east coast of NA to LAM = 3,500 miles.
- example data - http://tinyurl.com/b36z4
To forestall accusations that I'm hiding my sources and making claims
that I then fail to provide data for, check various of these
references and find these voyages described in various detail by what
will no doubt be good and bad websites, but my claims will, I think,
be fully substantiated by anyone who is even remotely unbiased about
this. Feel free to ask questions if you cannot understand what my
claims actually are.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
End quote
Not being able to "understand what my claims actually are" is one of
the benefits of Philip Deitiker's mode of responding to articles. I
suppose it is consistent with his mode of arguing. :-(
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- References:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Prev by Date: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by Date: Re: Catal Huyuk/Hutuk?
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|