Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: "Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 09:52:39 +0200
Tom McDonald wrote: E9eNe.723$1g2.333@xxxxxxxx,
Eric Stevens wrote:Philip Deitiker wrote:
nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in news:4u3ag19c11vcmqne8jqh26vhmaoc2rjath@xxxxxxx:
ever. And _MY POINT_ was that after traveling 250 or 500 miles west from baffin Island a logical person after reviewing what was to the left and right of them, would conclude that further expedition was to what end? More cold intolerable climate with an inability to support pastoral herding. Do you see an abundance of livestock on the islands west of baffin island.
No. And that makes absolutely no difference at all.
I see, well, since logic doesn't apply to your rules of argument, I see no further need to discuss this with you.
Chicken! :-)
In fact, what you are running away from is that nospam is not going to be suckered into using your flawed logic as the basis of the discussion.
I've rather lost the thread, in all the cacophony. What discussion are we talking about?
I am with you Tom.
-- P.A.
.
- References:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Prev by Date: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by Date: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading