Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:38:00 GMT
Apparently on date Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:07:32 +1200, Eric Stevens
<eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>On Fri, 19 Aug 2005 00:56:06 GMT, Philip Deitiker
><Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in
>>news:4u3ag19c11vcmqne8jqh26vhmaoc2rjath@xxxxxxx:
>>
>>>>ever. And _MY POINT_ was that after traveling 250 or 500 miles
>>>>west from baffin Island a logical person after reviewing what
>>>>was to the left and right of them, would conclude that further
>>>>expedition was to what end? More cold intolerable climate with
>>>>an inability to support pastoral herding. Do you see an
>>>>abundance of livestock on the islands west of baffin island.
>>>
>>> No. And that makes absolutely no difference at all.
>>
>>I see, well, since logic doesn't apply to your rules of argument, I
>>see no further need to discuss this with you.
>
>Chicken! :-)
>
>In fact, what you are running away from is that nospam is not going to
>be suckered into using your flawed logic as the basis of the
>discussion.
Yep. When I stick to the subject for long enough, Deitiker gives up because his
little games aren't working. He can't win on the subject I'm using because he
is making ridiculous assertions that a moment using Google will refute, and he
has no actual sources.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- References:
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: nospam
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Prev by Date: Re: Catal Huyuk/Hutuk?
- Next by Date: Re: Catal Huyuk/Hutuk?
- Previous by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by thread: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|