Re: Ancient automation
- From: "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:21:08 -0500
"Seppo Renfors" <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4305715C.BAB427EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> deowll wrote:
>>
> [..]
>
>>
>> I'm merely going to observe that I think a bow of some sort might store
>> enough power to move wings or a propeller enough to fly some small
>> distance.
>> That is about the best I can see during the time frame for self powered
>> flight.
>
> If you use a "bow" to launch it with like an arrow - it is hardly
> "self powered". is it.
>
The first known flying device used a bow and it wasn't to launch it like an
arrow.
> --
> SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
> misled.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Ancient automation
- References:
- Ancient automation
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: Paul Burke
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: deowll
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: zolota
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: deowll
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: zolota
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: deowll
- Re: Ancient automation
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Ancient automation
- Prev by Date: Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
- Next by Date: Re: Ancient automation
- Previous by thread: Re: Ancient automation
- Next by thread: Re: Ancient automation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|