Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone

nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says in
news:io2cg1tm4ab2e5n1usm4okqskjbaoh00jv@xxxxxxx:

> Yep. When I stick to the subject for long enough, Deitiker gives
> up because his little games aren't working.

UNlike others here once I determine someone is a kook, I don't waste
an incredible amount of time arguing with them. You will find very
few post of mine to Inger, Seppo, Grapheus, DJM, Conrad, . . . . .
when I come around to ignoring you it generally means that I have
formulated that you belong to that group. Congradulations.

Now if you like I can dice appart your propoganda like I did to Jim
McGinn, making good issue out of the flaws in your argument
construction and out of the propoganda you insert to cover those
flaws. You should note that McGinn, like your doing currently, had a
world class temper-tantrum after I did this, however, over time he
learned just a little from the discussion. Unfortunately I don't have
alot of time to waste educating kooks and getting up to a 3rd grade
understanding of debate tactics. As a result I mainly ignore them.
But if you insist I can dice your argument up for you, if you really
insist.
.