Re: V.M. last word

Ms Inger writes:

"Mr Towe, your assumptions here as well as in many other cases are your
weak spot. There are as JL shown many of them in your argumentations
and papers dealing with VM. That you can't understand that you need to
know more about Medieval ink, Medieval colors, Medieval handwritten
documents, then you do seem to know, that's also one other of your weak
points. I can't understand that you in your position don't deal with
handwritten Medieval documents as often as desired for a correct
interpretation of what's possible and what's normal."

This comment is off the topic. It has nothing to do with Mr. Mousse's
flawed scientific assertions about X-rays etc. nor my corrections of
Mr. Mousse and his misunderstandings and inaccuracies.

However, YOU have NEVER bothered to answer questions about your OWN
rambling assertions. Will you please answer the questions that have
been raised by your own comments?

(1) One would need an electron microscope to see your natural anatase
clearly for accurate comparison with that on the Vinland Map.
Therefore, where has any of your natural anatase been described in
detail so that we (and you, yourself) can be sure that it is like that
seen on the Vinland Map?

(2) If we see natural anatase in your medieval ink, why don't we also
see the other mineral sands or clays too? How is that possible? Doesn't
it seem strange that you can see the anatase but not the sand that is
sprinkled on the ink with it?

(3) Can you help us by pointing, specifically, to a few other medieval
documents that have sand (any kind) remaining on them? If this was a
common menthod of drying ink, where are the other documents?

Any scholar, any theory of science, requires support (data) consistent
with the theory. You have not provided any answers that even moderately

support your natural anatase theory. If you are unwilling to do so why
should anyone believe you? How about some answers? That's the
scholarly, scientifc way, don't you agree?

If, Ms. Johansson, you are unwilling or unable to answer questions that
are raised directly as a result of your own assertions and theories
then there is no reason for anyone to continue a dialog with you. Nor
is there any reason why anyone reading your garbled material should
give it any consideration at all. One would be completely justified in
ignoring you too.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: V.M. last word
    ... friends since High School today scholars with alike ... > One would need an electron microscope to see your natural anatase ... > If we see natural anatase in your medieval ink, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Scholars and Theory of Science former Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... > One would need an electron microscope to see your natural anatase ... > enough to have any relationship to the anatase seen on the Vinland Map. ... > If we see natural anatase in the ink, why don't we also see the ... > strange that you can see the anatase but not the sand that is sprinkled ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Scholars and Theory of Science former Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... One would need an electron microscope to see your natural anatase ... enough to have any relationship to the anatase seen on the Vinland Map. ... If we see natural anatase in the ink, why don't we also see the ... strange that you can see the anatase but not the sand that is sprinkled ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Loading