Re: How far back do traces of man go ? Why do these not support evolution?
- From: David Johnson <trolleyfan_spamfree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:55:05 GMT
harunyahya2011@xxxxxxxxx wrote in news:1126266499.091857.268170
@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
[snip]
Oh joy. Now we've got a creationist loonie...who doesn't even know the
difference between "archaeology" and "anthropology"...
David
--
_______________________________________________________________________
David Johnson home.earthlink.net/~trolleyfan
"You're a loony, you are!"
"They said that about Galileo, they said that about Einstein..."
"Yeah, and they said it about a good few loonies, too!"
.
- References:
- How far back do traces of man go ? Why do these not support evolution?
- From: harunyahya2011
- How far back do traces of man go ? Why do these not support evolution?
- Prev by Date: Giza, Revised book
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map -- Find Or Fraud?
- Previous by thread: Re: How far back do traces of man go ? Why do these not support evolution?
- Next by thread: Re: How far back do traces of man go ? Why do these not support evolution?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|