Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Tom McDonald <tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:22:09 -0500
Alaca wrote:
Tom McDonald wrote: 1yIVe.38537$1g2.27364@xxxxxxxx,
Alaca wrote:
ie wrote:
"Doug Weller" skrev
I_e,johansson wrote:
"Eric Stevens" skrev
"Alan Crozier" wrote:
"JerryT" wrote
"Alan Crozier" skrev
If the authors of these French, German, Greek, Arabic studies have not made their results known to American scholars they only have themselves to blame.
Why should they blame themselves? Can't a non-American scholar contribute to science in their own language? Isn't American scholars interested enough to get foreign work translated by and for themselves.
The ambition of most scholars is to make their work known to as many people as possible and to have their ideas accepted and cited. Few academics boast of their published work without revealing where it is published or the name under which they wrote. I'm not sure that these non-English works exist in the first place.
While I know what is driving you, surely you would not go so far as to say that no published papers are worthwhile unless they are published in English?
Most of this worlds excellent scholastic works never ever been published in English. It's a hugh presumption that English is the language of scholastic works. Up to Modern Age two language were more commonly used - Latin and French. Latin for dissertations and many of the works dealing with for example the Goths either never been translated into English or badly translated into English. More of them has been published in French over the years.
Last time I looked (quite a while ago), quite a few Scandinavian scientific journals were in English.
Doug, you seem to believe that everything been in edited journals of today. It's not been so many works edited dealing with Ancient Age to end of Migration Age after 1900 AD. Works yes but not deep studies. I made a phonecall earlier today to our University Library who has access to more than the Libris I can look in myself. When she, it was a she, gone thru what she could find where the versions of Tacitus were carefully discussed, it turned out that she couldn't find anyone later than the one I had knowledge about - one dissertation written in Lund 1868. One can't compare the last 20 years with earlier years. And most related to a combination of Archaeology and History hardly ever been translated in full to English.
Inger, this branche of the thread was about flooding and drying-up of the Mediterranean, not about translations of Tacitus. It is a result of your post this morning 8:43
" It had dried up to an extant that NONE of the US- edited Geologic works seems to have information about. I guess that depends on the fact that most of the studies and analyses of that almost never were translated into English. The French, German, Greek, Arabic studies to name a few mostly never been translated in full to English language and that's sad. "
Yup. This is not supported by Inger, and actively not supported by, well, the facts.
Of course, if she is talking about specialized studies in medieval issues prior to the 20th century, she is probably not far off.
But even if lots of stuff were to have been translated into English, I suspect she'd claim that the English translations are useless in some way or the other; whatever would support her argument du jour.
Unless they are from Swedish scholars
If the Swedish scholars do the translation, *those* Swedish scholars are no scholars, and Inger gets to ignore them. If she likes. Or not.
Don't change the subject every time when your trousers start to drop.
Oh GOD, Peter! ANYTHING to prevent that from happening in public.
No need for a public happening. Just a small party of close ... erm, well ... and a DVD afterwards. Make that a double, for all the variations and "the making off" People are buying everything these days .
Let the girl stay pantsed in whatever way she must! No one deserves the alternative!
Yes we do. Everthing is better than all this talking about archaeology.
Well, yeah. Wouldn't want that now, would we.
What's your take on the paddle symbol? And do you think Figure 4c shows warriors, or a bunch of guys with hammers getting ready for beers around the TV, watching a nice game of footie?
-- Tom McDonald http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/ .
- References:
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Alaca
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: kenney
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: ie
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: JerryT
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: ie
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: ie
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- From: Alaca
- Re: Goths in Dacia
- Prev by Date: Re: Goths in Dacia
- Next by Date: Re: Friendly Ghosts vs. Angry Ghosts `~
- Previous by thread: Re: Goths in Dacia
- Next by thread: Re: Goths in Dacia
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|