Re: Wolter talk report
- From: "inger" <I_ejohansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 21:32:49 GMT
"Doug Weller" <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:9bi3j1dvuofhgdf8sd3gg408ntbq12aq3o@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> http://www.isanticountynews.com/2005/September/21runstone.html
>
> Doug
I agree, as I earlier told some reading this, with Wolter that the stone is
a landclaim. That's the reason why I for several years have been saying that
it's either genuine or carved in 1520's. The Churchman I have in mind who I
know follewed with a ship westward to visit relatives who the family in
Denmark hadn't heard of for almost 100 years were knows as a forger in his
days, and the mission the ship was sent out for was to retake lost land,
and the person in question was one of the few before the last 30 years to
have had access to all needed information in Denmark and Norway about the
1355-fall 1363 mission.
Inger E
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wolter talk report
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Wolter talk report
- Prev by Date: Re: Separation of Particles.
- Next by Date: Re: Separation of Particles.
- Previous by thread: Geophysics in archeology
- Next by thread: Re: Wolter talk report
- Index(es):