Re: Wolter talk report
- From: Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:38:43 GMT
inger wrote:
>
> "Doug Weller" <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:9bi3j1dvuofhgdf8sd3gg408ntbq12aq3o@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > http://www.isanticountynews.com/2005/September/21runstone.html
> >
> > Doug
>
> I agree, as I earlier told some reading this, with Wolter that the stone is
> a landclaim.
In this respect I think Wolter is wrong - *IF* it was a "land claim"
then it would have said so - it doesn't and therefor it isn't. As far
as that goes it has to actually be interpreted as a LOSS of land if
anything at all in relation to land. The story is one of defeat after
all. That doesn't mean it supports any previous ownership of land
either. All it supports is the story on the stone - nothing else.
> That's the reason why I for several years have been saying that
> it's either genuine or carved in 1520's.
It makes even less sense to be carved in 1520 than it being a "fake"
made in the late 1880's and that just doesn't make any sense at all.
> The Churchman I have in mind who I
> know follewed with a ship westward to visit relatives who the family in
> Denmark hadn't heard of for almost 100 years were knows as a forger in his
> days, and the mission the ship was sent out for was to retake lost land,
> and the person in question was one of the few before the last 30 years to
> have had access to all needed information in Denmark and Norway about the
> 1355-fall 1363 mission.
You appear to run two different things into one above - a 1520's
forger with the "1355-fall 1363 mission" as if they were the same
event.
--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wolter talk report
- From: Yuri Kuchinsky
- Re: Wolter talk report
- References:
- Re: Wolter talk report
- From: inger
- Re: Wolter talk report
- Prev by Date: Roman Villa found by man looking at ariel photographs
- Next by Date: Re: Roman Villa found by man looking at ariel photographs
- Previous by thread: Re: Wolter talk report
- Next by thread: Re: Wolter talk report
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|