Re: Credentials without credit, or credit without credentials?

Seppo Renfors wrote:

....snip crap that shows Seppo is in it to abuse Ken; and to avoid seeing that Ken mentions his qualifications because they have been challenged. By the qualifications-challenged, as it happens...

Oh, and for Ken Towe's sole "benefit" as he frequently asks about my
"qualifications", let me put it this way


	Yes, Seppo. Put it some way...other than the truth, of course.

- unlike Ken *I* don't NEED
to stand on a dung heap and crow about my "qualifications" - instead I
just point out that people refer to ME in their history books, 

	Cite?

which I
won't crow about either! 

	...he crowed.

Or even that *I* have been first to reveal IN
PRINT certain aspects of our history, now accepted to be correct....


	Cite?

not to mention all the other stuff I have published.... 

	Cite?

- not that any
of that makes the slightest bit of difference to anything.

Well, if you are lying, or inflating your accomplishments, it might make some difference. Not to me; although I would be intrigued as to what you consider these accomplishments to be.

I could see you being written up in a book on the legal history of the industrial magistrates; and I could see you revealing that at least one person of Scandinavian heritage in Oz was an incredible meat-head; or that you've published a great deal of Vogon poetry at your own expense.

But it's really easier and more likely to be true that you are just making it up as you go along, Seppo.

	Prove me wrong.

--
Tom McDonald
http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
.