Re: Credentials without credit, or credit without credentials?



Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors wrote:
> >
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> >
> >>Seppo Renfors wrote:
> >>
> >>...snip crap that shows Seppo is in it to abuse Ken; and to avoid
> >>seeing that Ken mentions his qualifications because they have
> >>been challenged. By the qualifications-challenged, as it happens...
> >
> >
> >
> > In your case that should read "mentally challenged" - something you
> > demonstrate well - and lets not forget the short little statistical
> > examination I made of your posting history - 80% of it was stalking
> > Inger, abusing her. So don't be jealous of Ken, you have already been
> > analysed and declared VALUELESS. Interestingly it is for the same
> > reason - YOU wouldn't know *** from a shovel either!
>
> Oh dearie me. Unmarked snip, Seppo.

I really don't give a rats arse what you snivel and whine over.

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Quantcast