Re: Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- From: "deowll" <deowll@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:44:44 -0500
"Horace LaBadie" <hwlabadiejr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hwlabadiejr-223A3C.14523323092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Controversy resumes about the validity fo the interpretation of the
> fossils.
>
> <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4268122.stm>
>
> HWL
> ____________________________________________________________________
> "You never know when a dead rabbit might come in handy."
I saw a broad cast on the topic. One of the planets leading experts on
brains said this isn't sapians in any shape form or fasion. It wasn't just
that the brain was small. Some portions were much larger than expected. The
modal of the brain was to be blunt obviously different in ways that are very
important.
Unless I see a brain reconstruction that matches I'm not buying it besides
the proportions of the body were different. I believe the range on dates on
this being were 90,000 to 12,000 Bp and that does present problems.
It does not wash that H f is H s no matter how much wishful thinking
somebody does.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- References:
- Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- From: Horace LaBadie
- Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- Prev by Date: THE GREAT PYRAMID Time Features Morton Edgar 1924
- Next by Date: Inger isn't stalking me!!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- Next by thread: Re: Flores Hobbit Find Disputed Again
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
