sci.archaeology

• Date Index

• Origin of Food. Rice, Ortza sativa., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Origin of Food. Rice, Oryza sativa., Philip Deitiker
• Where can I find syllabaries for Elamite/Akkadian cuneiform, zerSpamNotToOthersotype
  • Re: Where can I find syllabaries for Elamite/Akkadian cuneiform, Philip Deitiker
• Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, Eric Stevens
  • Message not available
    • Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, Eric Stevens
  • Message not available
    • Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, Doug Weller
  • Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, nospam
  • Message not available
    • Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?, Philip Deitiker
• Re: Smallpox and Greenland, Eric Stevens
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Peter Alaca
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Peter Alaca
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Peter Alaca
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations, Philip Deitiker
• Re: New book, Philip Deitiker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New book, Philip Deitiker
• Inger's spam email claims, Doug Weller
  • Re: Inger's spam email claims, JerryT
    • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Doug Weller
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, JerryT
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Doug Weller
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, JerryT
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Doug Weller
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, JerryT
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Erik Hammerstad
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Peter Alaca
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, JerryT
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Peter Alaca
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, bogart . lloy
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Inger's spam email claims, David Johnson
• Re: Theoretical and ideologically approaches to the figurines, Michael Kuettner
  • Re: Theoretical and ideologically approaches to the figurines, Uwe Müller
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Theoretical and ideologically approaches to the figurines, berrak
• Re: Libels, Philip Deitiker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Libels, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Libels, Dylan Sung
  • Re: Libels, David Johnson
    • Re: Libels, Philip Deitiker
• Re: Doug and Tom stop stalking, bogart . lloy
  • Re: Doug and Tom stop stalking, Peter Alaca
  • Re: Doug and Tom stop stalking, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Doug and Tom stop stalking, Peter Alaca
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Doug and Tom stop stalking, Thomas Zahr
• Re: Where in the world is Regis (not Philbin)?, Philip Deitiker
• OT Arch-Word of the Day, Juridically., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: OT Arch-Word of the Day, Juridically., Peter Alaca
    • Re: OT Arch-Word of the Day, Juridically., Philip Deitiker
    • Re: OT Arch-Word of the Day, Juridically., Philip Deitiker
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT Arch-Word of the Day, Juridically., Dylan Sung
• Re: Igor Weller & Libels, Philip Deitiker
• Re: REPOST: Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: REPOST: Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Eric Stevens
• THE GREAT PYRAMID Time Features Morton Edgar 1924, 84rms
• Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond, I_E_Johansson
  • Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond, Richard Flavin
    • Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond, I_E_Johansson
• Re: mounds around the world, Philip Deitiker
• Re: Venus de Milo, O.H.
• Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's, zero-DeleteThisWhenReplying_type
  • Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's, kenney
    • Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's, zeroSpamNottype
      • Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's, kenney
      • Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's, zeroNoLimitsOrSpamtype
• Re: Artifacts/Artefacts Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, bogart . lloy
• Re: Artifact/Artefact definition. [formally: How the wantedly ignorant veiw Science], Philip Deitiker
• Llama la mama, salama, salama, salama, Philip Deitiker
• OT Quota Requirments: Useless thread starter, Philip Deitiker
• Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", t(nospam)kavanagh
  • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", I_E_Johansson
    • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", Tom McDonald
      • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", Philip Deitiker
      • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", Tom McDonald
    • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", t(nospam)kavanagh
      • Message not available
      • Re: Answer to tk. Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", t(nospam)kavanagh
      • Re: Answer to tk. Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", Dylan Sung
  • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha", Tom McDonald
    • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathinginLinkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takemeaway, hee hee, haha", t(nospam)kavanagh
• Grand Llama Nicholas of St. Sausage, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Grand Llama Nicholas of St. Sausage, Alaca
• Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, Alaca
  • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, Alaca
      • Re: Was the Swing Set known in America before Vinland got Lost?, Philip Deitiker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, That's Mr Fat Bastard to you Sonny
    • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, I_E_Johansson
  • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, VtSkier
  • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Was the wheel known in America before Viking Age?, kenney
• OT how [Not] to use a reader while being anonymous., Philip Deitiker
• Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, kenney
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Thomas Zahr
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Eric Stevens
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Eric Stevens
      • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
      • Message not available
      • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Eric Stevens
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, tomstdenis
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, kenney
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, kenney
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Tom McDonald
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, kenney
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Peter Alaca
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, bogart . lloy
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, Tom McDonald
  • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, kenney
    • Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups, bogart . lloy
• Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tedd Jacobs
  • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Lee Olsen
    • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tedd Jacobs
  • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, t(nospam)kavanagh
    • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, bogart . lloy
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, t(nospam)kavanagh
    • Re: Anyone know whether North American Indians used dug pits for hunting?, Philip Deitiker
• Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathing in Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to take me away, hee hee, haha", bogart . lloy
  • Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathing in Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to take me away, hee hee, haha", Tom McDonald
• Re: Iraqis And Afghans Are Much More Optimistic About Their Country Than American "Opinion Makers", Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Iraqis And Afghans Are Much More Optimistic About Their Country Than American "Opinion Makers", Italo
• Re: "Remember The Maine! To Hell With Spain!", Jim McLaughlin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Remember The Maine! To Hell With Spain!", Fred J . McCall
• Re: Stench Prompted U.S. Troops to Burn Islamofascist Corpses, Jim McLaughlin
  • Re: Stench Prompted U.S. Troops to Burn Islamofascist Corpses, Italo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Stench Prompted U.S. Troops to Burn Islamofascist Corpses, Fred J . McCall
• OT How to find someones home group., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: OT How to find someones home group., wee tam
• Beverly Roman Coins, Richard Flavin
  • Re: Beverly Roman Coins, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Beverly Roman Coins, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Beverly Roman Coins, Doug Weller
      • Message not available
      • Re: Beverly Roman Coins, Doug Weller
    • Re: Beverly Roman Coins, Richard Flavin
• On the issue of Little Flores Man., Philip Deitiker
• BBC: Royal Chinese treasure discovered, Horace LaBadie
• Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
  • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Impacts on Archaeological Resources within Southwestern Idaho, Philip Deitiker
• Help wanted for a website, George
• Homo Florensis, kenney
  • Re: Homo Florensis, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Homo Florensis, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Homo Florensis, Alaca
      • Re: Homo Florensis, nospam
      • Message not available
      • Re: Homo Florensis, Alaca
      • floresiensis Re: Homo Florensis, Doug Weller
      • Re: floresiensis Re: Homo Florensis, Tom McDonald
      • Re: floresiensis Re: Homo Florensis, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Homo Florensis, Seppo Renfors
• Re: Correct information re. Anatase contradict present paradigm, kenney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Correct information re. Anatase contradict present paradigm, kenney
• Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Uwe Müller
    • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Uwe Müller
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., I_E_Johansson
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Alaca
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Alaca
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Uwe Müller
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Alaca
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Eric Stevens
      • Re: Inventio Fortunata and the North Pole. New estimate of the 14th century pole., Eric Stevens
• Giant skeleton Unearthed !, elsa . moreau
  • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Doug Weller
    • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Seppo Renfors
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, elsa . moreau
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, StephenGadfly
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, gonzokid
      • Message not available
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, nospam
      • Re: Giant skeleton Unearthed !, Eric Stevens
• Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
  • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, nospam
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, markovic
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Alaca
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, nospam
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Eric Stevens
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Why and How the Roman Empire Fell, Raktizer Omheit
• Re: SV: at last, Vinland Map forgery scenario?, kenney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: at last, Vinland Map forgery scenario?, kenney
  • Re: at last, Vinland Map forgery scenario?, Horace LaBadie
    • Re: at last, Vinland Map forgery scenario?, Paul J Gans
• Re: The Vinland Map is a fake [Was:Re: comments to Philip's and Paul's 'conclusion, kenney
  • Re: The Vinland Map is a fake [Was:Re: comments to Philip's and Paul's 'conclusion, Philip Deitiker
• Re: comments to Philip's and Paul's 'conclusions re. Vinland Map, kenney
• Re: The Vinland Map -- Find Or Fraud?, kenney
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Vinland Map -- Find Or Fraud?, kenney
  • Re: The Vinland Map -- Find Or Fraud?, Philip Deitiker
  • Re: The Vinland Map -- Find Or Fraud?, Tom McDonald
• Re: Resident Village Idiot Septic Renfors, aka Zeppo the blimp, aka Seppo (The, kenney
• Re: Criminal Stalker Tony Smith at it again!, kenney
• Re: Chromatography and the Vinland Map, kenney
  • Re: Chromatography and the Vinland Map, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Chromatography and the Vinland Map, Tom McDonald
      • Message not available
      • Re: Chromatography and the Vinland Map, Tom McDonald
  • Re: Chromatography and the Vinland Map, Seppo Renfors
• Re: The CON ARTIST attmepts to save his sorry bacon with SNAKE OIL, kenney
• Scene 12. Columnbutt and the Zeron Borthers, Philip Deitiker
• Check it Out!, nikool29
• The Vinland Map is a Fake. Here's some comic relief., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: The Vinland Map is a Fake. Here's some comic relief., Alaca
    • Re: The Vinland Map is a Fake. Here's some comic relief., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: The Vinland Map is a Fake. Here's some comic relief., Alaca
      • Re: The Vinland Map is a Fake. Here's some comic relief., Philip Deitiker
• Beginners Guide to Sci.Archaeology., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Beginners Guide to Sci.Archaeology., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Beginners Guide to Sci.Archaeology., bogart . lloy
  • Message not available
    • Re: Beginners Guide to Sci.Archaeology., Philip Deitiker
• The Athenian Democracy Illusion, Raktizer Omheit
• New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Doug Weller
  • SV: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Inger.E.J
    • Re: SV: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, kenney
  • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Eric Stevens
  • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Peo
    • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Peo
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Alaca
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Peo
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Philip Deitiker
      • SV: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, I_E_Johansson
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Alaca
      • Re: New book on Rosslyn Chapel, Sinclair, and the Templars, Philip Deitiker
• Re: Inger's publication - real soon now?, Alan Crozier
  • Re: Inger's publication - real soon now?, hyperoglyphe
    • Re: Inger's publication - real soon now?, bogart . lloy
      • Re: Inger's publication - real soon now?, George
• Re: How We Know, Horace LaBadie
  • Re: How We Know, Philip Deitiker
    • Re: How We Know, kenney
      • Re: How We Know, Soren Larsen
      • Message not available
      • Re: How We Know, Eric Stevens
  • Re: How We Know, Eric Stevens
• 1491, Philip Deitiker
  • Message not available
    • Re: 1491, jgigantino
      • Re: 1491, Philip Deitiker
• The Mystery of Easter Island, Nikki MacLeod
• Crisis at Columbia: Nadia Abu El-Haj, yared22311
• South American Calendar - Parapegma, Henry . Mann
  • Message not available
    • Re: South American Calendar - Parapegma, benlizross
      • Re: South American Calendar - Parapegma, Doug Weller
• Re: The Vinland Map Ink Argument, Fred J. McCall
  • Message not available
    • Re: The Vinland Map Ink Argument, Philip Deitiker
• What sunken city?, TomiA
  • Re: What sunken city?, Alan Crozier
    • Re: What sunken city?, Doug Weller
• Turkish artifacts, Bill Johnson
• the value of a palace key?, Bill Johnson
  • Re: the value of a palace key?, Bill Gray
    • Re: the value of a palace key?, Dylan Sung
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Bill Gray
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, t(nospam)kavanagh
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, o8TY
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, Alaca
      • Re: the value of a palace key?, lorad474
  • Re: the value of a palace key?, faginea
  • Re: the value of a palace key?, Larry Caldwell
• Arctic Ice changes, Eric Stevens
• The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
  • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
    • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Tom McDonald
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Philip Deitiker
    • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), lorad474
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
      • SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), inger
      • Re: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
      • SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), inger
      • Re: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
      • Re: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • SV: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), inger
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Philip Deitiker
      • Message not available
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Thomas Zahr
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), lorad474
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), lorad474
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Philip Deitiker
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Thomas Zahr
  • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Tom McDonald
    • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Doug Weller
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Tom McDonald
    • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
  • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), nospam
    • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), nospam
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), nospam
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), nospam
      • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), Eric Stevens
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), kenney
  • Re: The Templars' Secret Island (Was Re: Templar miscellani), kenney
• FSMism, Gilgamesh
  • Re: FSMism, nospam
    • Re: FSMism, Gilgamesh
• Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), kenney
  • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Doug Weller
  • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Philip Deitiker
    • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), kenney
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Ken Towe
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), kenney
      • Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!), Seppo Renfors
• Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, nospam
    • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM, Seppo?, David B.
    • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM, Seppo?, Ken Towe
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
    • SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, inger
      • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alaca
      • Message not available
      • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Doug Weller
      • SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, inger
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alan Crozier
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, bogart . lloy
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alaca
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, bogart . lloy
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Thomas Zahr
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alan Crozier
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alaca
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, nospam
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Doug Weller
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Doug Weller
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, bogart . lloy
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tom McDonald
      • Message not available
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
      • The Value of the VM., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, inger
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Doug Weller
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alaca
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Horace LaBadie
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Alaca
      • Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Thomas Zahr
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
    • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, kenney
    • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Ken Towe
      • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?, Seppo Renfors
• Re: Hines- Fool Or Fraud?, Seppo Renfors
• Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, markovic
  • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Alan Crozier
  • SV: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, inger
    • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Alaca
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Alan Crozier
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, markovic
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Geronimo
      • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Geronimo
  • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Italo
    • Re: Were the Massagetae Massagoths?, Italo
• Hippy Happy? A solution., Philip Deitiker
  • Re: Hippy Happy? A solution., JerryT
    • Re: Hippy Happy? A solution., Philip Deitiker
      • Message not available
      • SV: Hippy Happy? A solution., inger
      • Re: Hippy Happy? A solution., Dylan Sung
    • Re: Hippy Happy? A solution., Philip Deitiker
• Re: James Lumpkins - libeler, Horace LaBadie
  • Re: James Lumpkins - libeler, Michael Kuettner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: James Lumpkins - libeler, kenney
  • Re: SV: James Lumpkins - libeler, kenney
  • Re: SV: James Lumpkins - libeler, kenney
  • Re: SV: James Lumpkins - libeler, kenney
  • Re: James Lumpkins - libeler, kenney
  • Re: James Lumpkins - libeler, Horace LaBadie
• Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, TomiA
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Dylan Sung
    • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Alaca
      • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, TomiA
      • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Dylan Sung
    • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Tom McDonald
      • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Dylan Sung
  • Re: GEATA/GETAE/GOTHS, Teurontic tribes and Dacia, Dylan Sung
• Re: Greenland temperature in 900--1400, former Greenland farming and food., Horace LaBadie
  • Message not available
    • Re: Greenland temperature in 900--1400, former Greenland farming and food., Horace LaBadie
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Greenland temperature in 900--1400, former Greenland farming and food., Tom McDonald
• Profile of an ALLEGED forger, Seppo Renfors
  • Name the VM forger, Seppo Renfors
    • SV: Name the VM forger, inger
      • Re: Name the VM forger, Alan Crozier
      • Re: Name the VM forger, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: Name the VM forger, Seppo Renfors
    • Seppo- name the killers of Tupac & Biggie, David B
      • Re: Seppo- name the killers of Tupac & Biggie, Tom McDonald
      • Re: Seppo- name the killers of Tupac & Biggie, Philip Deitiker
      • David the WELSHER playing childs games again, Seppo Renfors
• Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Steve Marcus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, maison.mousse
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Doug Weller
  • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, maison.mousse
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
  • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Tom McDonald
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, David Johnson
  • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, David B
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Ken Towe, fraud and charlatan!, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, kenney
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Alaca
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Philip Deitiker
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Alaca
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Alaca
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
    • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, David Johnson
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Ken Towe
      • Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink, Seppo Renfors
• criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Franz Gnaedinger
  • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Jesper
    • SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, inger
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Dylan Sung
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, grapheus
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Dylan Sung
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, grapheus
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, observer
      • Re: SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Doug Weller
      • SV: SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, inger
      • Re: SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Dylan Sung
      • Re: SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Tom McDonald
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Dylan Sung
    • Message not available
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, grapheus
    • Message not available
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Doug Weller
      • SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, inger
      • Message not available
      • Re: SV: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Philip Deitiker
      • Message not available
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Philip Deitiker
    • Message not available
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, Franz Gnaedinger
      • Re: criminals abusing my e-mail addresses, grapheus
• Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., deowll
  • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Tedd Jacobs
    • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Alaca
      • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Philip Deitiker
    • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., deowll
      • To Mr Tedd Jacobs, I_E_Johansson
      • Re: To Mr Tedd Jacobs, Tedd Jacobs
      • Re: To Mr Tedd Jacobs, Doug Weller
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: SV: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Philip Deitiker
      • Re: SV: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Alaca
  • Message not available
    • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., deowll
      • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., Philip Deitiker
      • OT answer to Deowll., I_E_Johansson
      • Re: OT answer to Deowll., Doug Weller
      • Re: OT answer to Deowll., Philip Deitiker
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: SV: To Magnus Alkarp SV: Look who's stalking., deowll

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint