Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 14:08:18 -0500
In article <1128515196.249302.52720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
ken.towe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Towe) wrote:
> Mr. Renfors...You are truly a very sick man! You are so confused
> and so totally misinformed.
I have come to the conclusion that any one Seppo disagrees with is
correct. On the other hand pointing out his errors seems a waste of
time, he can not admit he made a mistake, and anyone sane will have
realised this by now, and that he is sixpence short of the shilling.
Ken Young
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM, Seppo?
- From: David B.
- Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: nospam
- Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Prev by Date: Re: Fe/cu ration iron gall ink
- Next by Date: Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Previous by thread: Re: Hines- Fool Or Fraud?
- Next by thread: Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
