Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?



kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In article <1128515196.249302.52720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> ken.towe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Ken Towe) wrote:
>
> > Mr. Renfors...You are truly a very sick man! You are so confused
> > and so totally misinformed.
>
> I have come to the conclusion that any one Seppo disagrees with is
> correct. On the other hand pointing out his errors seems a waste of
> time, he can not admit he made a mistake, and anyone sane will have
> realised this by now, and that he is sixpence short of the shilling.
>
> Ken Young

So now we have another, who BACK Ken in claiming nutty things like
"imenite is the same as sulphuric acid" (tmKen Towe) and
"Debye-Scherrer method was used to identify anatase a year before the
method was even invented" - (tmKen Towe) - WOW..... now there is an
interesting ride on a coat tail..... :-)

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
    ... > Mr. Renfors...You are truly a very sick man! ... and that he is sixpence short of the shilling. ... Ken Young ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
    ... >> Mr. Renfors...You are truly a very sick man! ... and that he is sixpence short of the shilling. ... The big clue is in the fact that not many people post back to him. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast