Re: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?

Apparently on date Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:12:04 -0500, Tom McDonald
<tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

>bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Doug wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>>I agree - if you want to talk privately
>>>>>about Ken, take it to email, you
>>>>>are being extremely rude here.
>>
>>
>>>"inger" wrote:
>>>
>>>>Doug,
>>>>not talking privately, only speaking in
>>>>a way that not every English talking
>>>>can understand. That's a difference.
>>
>>
>> Alan Crozier wrote:
>>
>>>It's still rude and insulting.
>>
>>
>> But *Inger* doesn't see it that way...
>> (and after all, Inger's *always* right).
>>
>> It follows, logically, (carefully
>> avoiding circleproofs and without
>> extrapolating far, far beyond the
>> proposition)... that we should be
>> free to post just about any opinion
>> we like about Inger. The opinion
>> merely needs to be composed in some
>> language she cannot comprehend.
>>
>> And that way, the sender (for once)
>> won't be accused of libel or of
>> violating EU statutes, or of causing
>> mental anguish to a netloon, because
>> "That's a difference"
>>
>> Hypothetically speaking, of course.
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>
>V fgebatyl oryvrir gung Vatre vf gur zbfg fbyvq naq eryvnoyr cbfgre
>ba guvf at. Ure ersreraprf ner nyjnlf ncbfvgr naq treznar, naq ure
>ernfbavat vf vzcrppnoyr.
>
>Vg vf uneq sbe zr gb haqrefgnaq jul fur trgf fhpu n ebhtu gvzr sebz
>pregnva cbfgref; creuncf vg vf wrnybhfl, be funhqraserhqr.

Ur ur, V tngure guvf vf n grfg gura...

.

Quantcast