Re: Hines gets it hopelessly wrong as well (Hi Seppo!)



kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In article <Xns96E696ECB3916prd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> (Philip Deitiker) wrote:
>
> > This is for Ken and all. Unless you are reading Inger or Seppo
> > for laughs, they really should be ignored.
>
> I normally do that, but as I use an off line reader I can not filter
> posts until after they are downloaded. As it is it depends on how much
> time I have available on whether or not I look at the junk. I agree,
> Inger, Seppo, Yuku and one or two others make a point of posting
> content free material, but today I both had time to read the posts and
> lost my temper.


Aha..... so I was right again when I suggested the poor *** can't
help himself but PEEK at my posts...... and then it has to whine and
whinge and go about blaming others for his own shortcomings, the poor
sod!

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Quantcast