Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:18:18 GMT
kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> In article <4349D3AD.877268EB@xxxxxxxxxx>, Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx (Seppo
> Renfors) wrote:
>
> > Ahhh... just another "Don't bother me with Logic and Facts" person I
> > need not bother with - though if the above claim was true, why would
> > such people then continue whining and whinging about that which the
> > ALLEGEDLY don't read??
>
> If you ever posted facts, rather than unsubstantiated insults,
Ken, since when does "insults" have to be "substantiated"? Oh and
because ANOTHER Ken (as in "Towe") is a snake oil selling
carpetbagger, you don't have to take that as a reference to you, you
know!
> I might take you more seriously.
Hey, Ken indicated right in the beginning how he wants to be dealt
with - by using the old "Do onto me as I do onto you" moral of dealing
with people - I'm merely the humble servant, complying with his
wishes!
> I have never kill filed you, I use an
> off line reader so it is not worth the effort.
I replied to the claim by you that: "I have given up on Seppo and
Inger. It takes a lot for me to decide that a poster will never say
anything worth reading,...." I have not claimed you have kill filed me
- only that your claim you don't read what I write is bogus, as
obviously you do.
> I have just given up
> the idea that you would ever post something that was worth that
> actually had any worthwhile information. You have reached the point
> where you are predictable and boring, and you would have failed the
> logic classes I have taken. It's the boring bit that annoys me.
I do tend to include a lot of information when the other person
provides some to address - most often, in Ken Towe's case, he doesn't
provide more than lies, insults and more lies. He then accuses ME of
lying in the face of evidence (that he deletes) of HIS OWN lying - it
is difficult to do more than post supporting evidence accordingly to
say I don't NEED to lie. Indeed it may well get a bit tedious, but
then that isn't MY doing. Lay blame where blame belongs, and look on
the other direction to find the appropriate quarter!
--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: kenney
- Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- References:
- Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- From: kenney
- Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Prev by Date: Re: the value of a palace key?
- Next by Date: Re: SV: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Previous by thread: Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Next by thread: Re: SV: SV: how did "modern anatase" get into VM?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
