Re: "Inger's experts remain unknown to everyone" or "Fear and loathingin Linkoping" or "Linger in the Sky with Diamonds" or "They're going to takeme away, hee hee, haha"

I_E_Johansson wrote:
>
> "t(nospam)kavanagh" <"tkavanag"@(nospam)indiana.edu> skrev i meddelandet
> news:djk2ne$gd$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> > >
> > > I_E_Johansson wrote:
> > > > Little did the funny people who abuse me once again by writing OT
> > > > subjectlines know that they are the one who will stand without cloths
> when
> > > > someone in the future do the first simple checking in the experts I
> happen
> > > > to know.
> > > > Gave a hint the other day and none.... N O N E.... of all you who pick
> on me
> > > > shown that you were able to find what's the easiest 6 experts to be
> found
> > > > among my old schoolmates from High School up. So poor researchers as
> those
> > > > who picks on me, I am more than glad never to have met in real life.
> > >
> > > My experts can beat up your experts.
> > >
> > > Mostly because they both exist and are not ashamed of their
> work.
> > >
> > > <snip>
> >
> > Based on current evidence, *I* can beat up Inger's experts.
> >
> > tk
>
> No you can't 'tk'. Neither in your own field nor in the other fields.

I will take them on in the field out back. Just name them.

>But of course you may belive what you want.

Rather it is you who appears to "belive" what *you* want.
And then you expect us to believe with you without any documentary
support. "Oh us of little faith!" Yea, verily show us the signs. I am,
after all, a Doubting Thomas.

> You loose anyhow.

I hang loose all the time.

> Could you please try to write about archaeology or history > instead of writing abusive lines?

Would you please cite your sources (who I can still beat up)
instead of abusing the methods of scholarship.

tk
.