Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 06:11:58 -0500
In article <pdp1m1tud35pi8t3vmjik3inidje72j08j@xxxxxxx>,
zero-DeleteThisWhenReplying_type@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:
> Does any other lexicon, in particular a more coprehensive lexicon,
> exist?
Have you considered that Old Persian cuneiform may have been used to
write a message in another language?
Ken Young
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zeroSpamNottype
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- References:
- Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zero-DeleteThisWhenReplying_type
- Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Prev by Date: Re: OT watch your distribution and f'ups
- Next by Date: Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond
- Previous by thread: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Index(es):
