Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zeroSpamNottype@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 12:33:53 +0100
> Have you considered that Old Persian cuneiform may have been used to
>write a message in another language?
>
> Ken Young
Indeed I have - the first thing I did was to convert the symbols to
their phonetic values. The result made no sense in English, whether or
not I included the symbol shaped like a "K" that wasn't a genuine
symbol but formed part of the "message" nonetheless. I also tried
inserting vowels between the corresponding consonants, but no luck.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zero-DeleteThisWhenReplying_type
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: kenney
- Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Prev by Date: Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond
- Next by Date: Re: The Straight Lines of the Great Pond
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|