Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's

In article <7434m1p7unjf51isfg1aum0rps9fcd1pha@xxxxxxx>,
zeroSpamNottype@xxxxxxxxx () wrote:

> Indeed I have - the first thing I did was to convert the symbols to
> their phonetic values. The result made no sense in English,

Well that settles that possibility. However if it is a copy of a
genuine inscription, it could have been one of the other languages of
the period. I seem to remember the Persians used Elamite and Akkadian
as well as old Persian.

Ken Young
.

Loading