Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zeroNoLimitsOrSpamtype@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:36:45 +0000
> Well that settles that possibility. However if it is a copy of a
>genuine inscription, it could have been one of the other languages of
>the period. I seem to remember the Persians used Elamite and Akkadian
>as well as old Persian.
Looking it up, you're right! I think I'm going to need to start a
separate thread for this to get people's attention, but does anyone
know where I can find syllabaries for these?
.
- References:
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: zeroSpamNottype
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- From: kenney
- Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Prev by Date: Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations
- Next by Date: Where can I find syllabaries for Elamite/Akkadian cuneiform
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G.Kent's
- Next by thread: Re: Venus de Milo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
