Re: Theoretical and ideologically approaches to the figurines
Michael Kuettner wrote: dk8e6b$i82$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
[...]
If he'd only asked about theoretical approach, your answer would
be sufficient. But he also mentioned "ideological"; so I gave a
pointer in that direction. As far as I can see from his 2nd post,
that's what he is looking for.
[...]
Here is a collection of papers under the title
THE CRITERIA OF SYMBOLICITY
http://tinyurl.com/9qwmo
Or as PDF (62pp, 389 Kb)
http://tinyurl.com/afp2t
¤ Criteria of symbolicity and the archaeology of
symbolism. How to fill the gap?
¤ Beyond the microscope. Recognizing symboling in the
archaeological record.
¤ Criteria of symbolicity. Intrinsic and extrinsic formal
properties of artifacts.
¤ Symbolism and tool stone "style".
¤ Symbol for them / symbol for us?
¤ The status of ethics in contemporary epistemology
and ontology, and the problem of meaning and values
(the symbolic) in archaeology.
¤ V. Gordon Childe among the "vulgar cognitivists".
--
º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°
.
