Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:41:58 GMT
Apparently on date Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:43:46 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx . . . :
>
>> At the end of the day, a chunk of iron that has attained a
>> velocity of 3,000,000 meters per second, as suggested by the
>
>No one claimed that objects traveled the speed of light. That's
>silly, it would take all the energy in the galaxy to move 'a chunk of
>iron' to the speed of light.
Blimey, you're posting to *every message* posted by someone who you've
killfiled, and who has killfiled you?
Busy, busy, busy. I can see you have little time to spare.
But try and find time to look up "speed of light" somewhere. It would help you
to avoid looking like an unscientific idiot.
I'm not looking at the other marked-read posts, maybe they made sense, maybe
they didn't. I just noticed a whole *heap* of marked-read ones and dipped in to
see. The above gem made me laugh out loud, is all.
As for the rest, well, since we're here:
>A chunk of a comet hit russia at the turn of the century.
An impactor most likely did. That is, something caused damage, nobody knows
what, but *Journalists* would say it was a comet. Astrophysicists wouldn't.
>comets do hit the planet.
I don't know what you mean by "comet". At this point, it probably includes
meteors.
>The issue is whether they would deposit
>uraniaum and other radioactive metals.
Assuming you mean Uranium, your's is a silly idea. Comets are formed with the
rest of the solar system from an accretion disc and as such, the comet has no
more uranium (etc) as any other bit of the solar system. It'll have less than
earth.
The supernova that created all the material that makes up the solar system
created the rest of the material, it's just moving about to and fro.
The other radioactive metals are in the same proportions and have undergone the
same decay as the rest in the same solar system.
Comets deposit mundane materials, albeit not ones found on the surface of the
planet, mostly.
>Of course if an object hit the
>moon with enough force, that force alone could generate radioative
>particles which would appear in the ejecta.
Would the moon be destroyed in the process? Do tell.
>Take a look at the moon
>and ask yourself the basic question, are things floating around
>powerful enough to cause great ejecta and quasinuclear events?
After the proto moon and proto earth struck and ended up forming the present
earth and present moon?
Like, and left the debris field that on earth has long gone but on the moon,
without the erosion of atmosphere, has left those massive craters?
If you are working on the basis of those craters being recent, you should talk
to Eric, he likes that catastrophism stuff. It would probably suit you quite
well, now I think about it. You'd unmask far more "trolls" with that position.
I know you'll "rebut" this post with something about dancing mammoths and Norse
on the moon, but I very probably won't read it. Still, you do what floats your
boat, Fill.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- References:
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- Prev by Date: Re: Viral Latency, Disease, and Migrations
- Next by Date: Re: Smallpox and Greenland
- Previous by thread: Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- Next by thread: Re: Possible evidence for Stone Age (Clovis) Cosmic Catastrophe?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|