Re: Hines-Renfors-Johansson-McCulloch team of scientific experts explain Vinland Map ink



Ken Towe wrote:
>

I note a serious case of ENVY from (green in the face) Ken Towe in his
"creative" subject line :-)

> Repeated requests have been made to those who cling to Vinland Map
> authenticity to come up with a scenario for how it was done. Amazingly,
> to date, on this topic they have continually absquatulated. Not even
> one scenario has been put forward. Even if authenticity might be the
> default position this major void needs to be filled. Well, now it can
> be done! With all of the learned discussion on the subject the world
> now has more than enough "nuggets" of wisdom from the D. Spencer
> Hines-Seppo Renfors-I.E. Johansson-Huston McCulloch team of scientific
> experts to move forward.

.....and the snake oil merchant is back it its old tricks - a "guilt by
association", while he assumes his mud slinging at one person
automatically tarnishes the other's reputation.

Hey TOM see.... THAT is the sort of thing I was referring to in the
Atlantis thread!
>
> Let's begin with a few of their "irrefutable" truths...
>
> With no disclaimers from the other members of the team, except for
> McCulloch (see below), D. Seppo Renfors has affirmed at least three
> undeniable truths...
>
> Veritas 1. The Olin experiment was a success.

True!

> It simulated the anatase in the ink seen on the Vinland Map.

FALSE! It is NOT what I have said - and again we see the Ken's NEED to
rely on LIES. FACT: The method created ANATASE.

> The Renfors Facts?

No - only "Towe fantasy" once more!

> Mar. 12. "The picture of Olin's efforts are heaped thicker than the
> sample from NL. Around the edges you will see a likeness in both - they
> are indistinguishable from each other."

True!.... and it remains true.

> Oct. 25. "Certainly Olin's experiment did NOT fail - and it is a lie to
> say it did! "

Correct!

> Veritas 2. The Cahill PIXE analyses found anatase, not only in the ink
> but also on the parchment.

It seems to be a common understanding that the Ti+ was in the form of
TiO2 and in the structure of anatase. That is a LOGICAL CONCLUSION,
something that Ken does not understand what it is even.

> The Renfors Facts?
> Oct. 24. " Is Ken Towe's statement "No anatase has been found on the
> parchment" true? No it is NOT, Ken Towe knows HE LIED when he made that
> statement..."

Indeed this is one of those CLASSIC LIES Ken Towe resorts to and I
keep exposing, to his chagrin. That part that should have, not only
his qualifications stripped, but even his shirt buttons ripped off
him, and those holding his braces as well! Then he would stand there
showing off his girdle and long-johns - and be as embarrassed as his
claims are to right thinking people.

> Veritas 3. Anatase from clays and other natural sediments can explain
> the Vinland Map ink without any need to isolate the anatase from the
> rest of the clay sediments.

THAT is a blatant LIE - one of those that the fraud has perpetuated
constantly and KNOWINGLY!

> The Renfors Facts?
> Oct. 25. "He then regurgitates the CRAP that there is a "need" to
> "isolating a material" when nothing is further from the truth!" Note
> the Renfors emphasis: "Nothing is further from the truth!"

CORRECT!

[..]


Now if that bloody lying snake oil selling charlatan cares to re-write
that in a manner VOID of false associations, lies and abuse I may
consider responding further - remember, MY words are MY words and
nobody else's - those NOT said by me are NOT MINE. Else you can piss
off again to pander to your creationist followers!!

--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Loading