Re: Hines-Renfors-Johansson-McCulloch team of scientific experts explain Vinland Map ink

Mr Kook,
first of all I have to tell you as usual can't read, can't comprehend or
what else reason can there be that you don't understand but continue your
abusive attacks?

I don't acknowledge anything what so ever taken out of it's context! NO
serious scholar would dream to act the way Mr Towe does and still believe
he/she would be taken seriously by anyone than those who missed all learnt
during lessons in Theories of Science,
which btw at least here in Sweden we have courses in on every single level
from B-level up!

You and Mr Towe don't seem to get it - a quote is a quote but nothing more
when taken out of it's context.
Those who refer to a quote instead of showing that they comprehend the text
where the quote origin aren't much of a scholar if that's all they can do.
Their followers are only copycats.

Inger E

"The Kook Wrangler" <wrangler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i
meddelandet
news:pan.2005.11.11.21.32.19.422650@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 16:00:47 +0000, IE_Johansson wrote:
>
> > Mr Towe,
> > I am not distressed with truth you told, you haven't told any up to now.
>
>
> Does this mean that you now acknowledge that the statements, made by you
> and quoted by Dr. Towe, were nothing more than the silly transparent lies
> of an unqualified fool?
>
> If so, is this the beginning of some insight into the depths of your own
> stupidity?
>
>
> > I am distressed that someone claiming to be a specialist in an area he
> > knows less than null about as shown in your lines here as well as in
> > per-viewed articles,
> > knows so little about Theories of Science that he believes a
> > circular-proof to be valid.
> > That's distressing to say the least!
>
> Hmmm..... One part of this equation holds a Doctorate as well as a number
> of other under and post graduate qualifications and has held various
> positions in industry and academia and thus enjoys the confidence of his
> academic peers, the other is a substitute Sunday school teacher with a
> well established penchant for drivelling on about things she knows nothing
> about, lying to try and paper over the many and manifest gaps in her
> pitiful knowledge, and who may or may not, hold a undergraduate Arts
> degree that apparently took her considerably longer than usual to get even
> that....
>
> Dunno about you, but I know which one my money is on....
>
> >
> > That such a scholar existed and starts libelling and worse whenever he
> > is shown that his assumptions not only are invalid but also impossible
> > from a scientific point of view to put forward, say a lot of the person
> > trying to use circular-proofs.....
> > Inger E
> >
>
> Given that you are yet to establish that you actually have a working
> knowledge of what such a basic legal concept as "libel" is, it places into
> considerable doubt that you have the faintest idea of any other term you
> blather on about.
>
> In short, you do not know what you are talking about.
>
>


.

Relevant Pages