Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates

Doug, Tom and Lloyd,
instead of being ironic you had better try to get hold of the number of
National Geographic where ideas alike mine were presented by more respected
scholars than anyone of you three.

Inger E

"Doug Weller" <dweller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:ju2po15ibe39d2ilcjd0kbma32q1i09gag@xxxxxxxxxx
> On 29 Nov 2005 09:04:38 -0800, in sci.archaeology, bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
>
> >Tom McDonald wrote:
> >> IE_Johansson wrote:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >>
> >> > Especially since exact identical angles on worked(!) flintstones been
found
> >> > here in Scandinavia.
> >
> >Well, D'oh! I suppose if we look at enough chipped flint
> >samples (whether chipped by humans or by nature) we'll
> >find enough different angles that *some* of them in one
> >group will match up with *some* of them in the other.
> >
> >Where is the reference data for the "identical angles"
> >found in scandinavian flintstones? And where did Inger
> >discover the published angles for the Calico examples?
>
> You beat me to it. I'm curious too as how she can make such a statement.
> >
> >Total bluster, methinks.
> >
> >> > AND btw - I own identical tools to seven of the presented
> >> > findings- almost exactly identical -
> >> > AND mine been shown to three different archaeologists who said that
three of
> >> > them have been used as scrapes, one to 'hammer' and the rest to
cut(some
> >> > kind of knifes).
> >>
> >> Could be. Show them to us. Then show us the comparables at Calico.
> >
> >[snip]
> >
> >Tom, you're smart enough to not hold your breath.
> >
> >I wonder... inn what branch of science, as taught in Sweden,
> >does radical interpretation and insistance on paradigm changes
> >precede the presentation of actual evidence?
> >
> >
> >Lloyd
> >*****
> --
> Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply
> Doug & Helen's Dogs http://www.dougandhelen.com
> A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at http://www.hallofmaat.com
> Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Correct info re Wolters academic merits! Re: Wolter on peer review.
    ... <inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> ... Contrary to Doug and Tom Wolter are a scholar in the subject geology. ... LIAR - this is another such instance - I have NOT libelled the puppy ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: New "I" Catagory List, Name Confusion
    ... > Inger E Johansson wrote: ... > Don't tell us to do our homework; it's your duty to show Doug ... Here we see the SOCK PUPPET of Douggie again....... ... appear that Tom derives a lot of pleasure out of it...... ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wolter on peer review.
    ... in this case" - then WHY make the totally baseless allegations in the ... eg like Doug Weller's odious implied ... "Nazi supporter" view and like madness Tom has previously supported! ... I wonder whether anyone can point me to peer reviewed work by ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Wolter on peer review.
    ... eg like Doug Weller's odious implied ... "Nazi supporter" view and like madness Tom has previously supported! ... It's a hugh mistake to lean to Birgitta Wallace. ... Birgitta Wallace relating to the KRS, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Disabled .wmf - now I cant view pictures in Windows XP - HELP!
    ... Doug: Here's the link: http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/ ... Tom ... | In reading some info in the security newsgroup, ... | blog, it appears software dep blocking does not work, only hardware. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)