Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: "IE_Johansson" <ingere.johansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 06:55:27 GMT
<joerevskelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:uZ6jf.33176$s92.12816@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "IE_Johansson" <ingere.johansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ZC0jf.39226$d5.195707@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Doug, Tom and Lloyd,
> > instead of being ironic you had better try to get hold of the number of
> > National Geographic where ideas alike mine were presented by more
> > respected
> > scholars than anyone of you three.
> >
> > Inger E
>
> Which issues you will not identify, because then someone would read them
and
> point out that they do not, in fact, support any part of your claims.
HAD you been a scholar, or a teacher of History you would have known about
the number,
better still you would have owned it and read it.
Inger E
>
>
.
- References:
- New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: IE_Johansson
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: IE_Johansson
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: Doug Weller
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: IE_Johansson
- Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- From: joerevskelton
- New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- Prev by Date: Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- Next by Date: Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- Previous by thread: Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- Next by thread: Re: New (well, very very old) Calico dates
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|