Re: CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- From: Hayabusa <peregrine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 01:02:31 +0100
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:00:55 GMT, "Larry Wilson"
<misha_linword@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The eclipse of 431 BCE *does
>not* meet this criteria, the eclipse track did not occur in Greece and it
>misses the description.
>
>However the eclipse of early 402BCE fits the description perfectly. This
>was then tested chronologically and it fit into the timeline developed where
>Cyrus begins his rule in 455BCE. So it grains credibility as being the
>original eclipse event.
Are you really suggesting that the historical count is off by 29
years? Is there a consistent pattern among other data? - So far I
thought that the data since ca.900 BCE are fairly fixed.
fkoe
.
- References:
- CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- From: Larry Wilson
- Re: CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- From: rms
- Re: CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- From: Larry Wilson
- CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- Prev by Date: Re: Origin of the Etruscan people?
- Next by Date: Re: Origin of the Etruscan people?
- Previous by thread: Re: CORRECTED ANCIENT ECLIPSE DATES
- Next by thread: يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading