Re: Just a new formulation


hagen wrote:
> The original five years of studying the topic, soon became ten years
> together, many addresses to many periodicals later, making every pixel
> myself.
> I promised my beloved to experience a publication, this has lost its
> meaning.
> I became suspicious, is this a boy cott? Can't be.
> Take Diether Shurr's groping attempt to locate stems (Kadmos 12,
> 1973, abb.3, p.12), but my absolute amount of 22 stems solves all his
> problems.
> Or take Werner Nahm's intuition for comparable sentences (Kadmos 18,
> 1979, abb.8 p.14) Join with brackets my reduced signgroups, gives the
> answer to his questions.
> For one hundred years all encyclopedias have pictured the Phaistos
> disc, a popular riddle.
> This case is done evil, alone by the reason that I can't blame good
> people in believing I am wrong in my observations, due to the lack of
> professional reactions.
> A Doomsday prophecy? No !
> A plain recovery of the Minoan calendar in accordance with its eight
> months, and a wealth of valid observations.
> More books have been written about the subject by experts not even
> mentioning my name.
> I am not a gambler, nevertheless a filthy poker game has been made out
> of my decipherment
>
> Hagen

Hi, Ole !
I wish you a Very Happy New Year !
I hope for you that in 2006 you will open your eyes, and stop deluding
yourself like you do when you are talking about "a Minoan calendar with
its eight months", instead of talking of "a non-Minoan possible PARTIAL
calendar including only 8 months".
And, please, try to understand that the fact that such a "calendar" has
only 8 months instead of 12 or 13 (as all the primitive calendars based
upon the Moon-cycles have) appears so strange to anybody, that anybody,
but you, has to think that "something must be wrong with the
hypothesis" ...
Best regards
grapheus

.

Loading