Re: KRS book: Geology
- From: "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2006 02:05:34 +0100
Eric Stevens wrote: ui0er1haaqgjv65jvqcrj1nb8cf7v5pr74@xxxxxxx,
"Peter Alaca" wrote:Eric Stevens wrote:
Please - please - read the book if you are you are going to continue consider sounding off. Ojakangas plotted six different types of greywacke on his particular triangle diagram and almost certainly examined many more specimens he did not consider worth plotting.
That would be a very unscientific procedure, since a (triangle) scatter diagram is not only meant to show similarities, but also differences. I am sure Ojakangas, if he is a serious scientistis, would not very happy with your comment above.
I understand him to be looking for similarities. When examining samples widly different from that of the KRS I would expect he would discard them from further consideration. He was looking for, and plotting, samples which were similar.
Why plotting similar samples? A triangle scattergram is used to show the relative composition of samples based on three elements. You feed the program with all relevant data and look for clustering and _differences_. You don't feed it with similar samples. If Ojakangas did that, then there is every reason to distrust him.
-- º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: KRS book: Geology
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: KRS book: Geology
- Prev by Date: Happy New Year Everyone
- Next by Date: Re: Just a new formulation
- Previous by thread: Re: KRS book: Geology
- Next by thread: Re: KRS book: Geology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|