Re: KRS book: Geology

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:26:02 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

--- snip ----

>>> No, I think it is the published scattergram,
>>> and if he did what you say he did, then he
>>> presentend only 'positive' results.
>
>> He presented the results closest to that of the KRS.
>
>That is what I'm saying: only the positive results.

Do you really want the diagrams for *all* the materials which the KRS
clearly isn't?
>
>>>> I think it is the obe he used to plot the alternatives
>>>> closest to the that of the KRS.
>
>>> And you believe him without seeing the _all_ the results?
>
>> Why not? He's got nothing to gain and everything to lose by lying. See
>> http://www.d.umn.edu/geology/people/fsbios/ojakangas.html
>
>I expected scattergrams. Dissapointing.
>But looking at his 'palmares', are ypou sure
>he did what you say he did?
>
--- snip----



Eric Stevens

.