Re: KRS book: Geology

On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:26:07 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote: 2t8hr1hbq7bub7l1t4pg6itr1agj8qefk2@xxxxxxx,
>
>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:26:02 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> --- snip ----
>>
>>>>> No, I think it is the published scattergram,
>>>>> and if he did what you say he did, then he
>>>>> presentend only 'positive' results.
>>>
>>>> He presented the results closest to that of the KRS.
>>>
>>> That is what I'm saying: only the positive results.
>>
>> Do you really want the diagrams for *all* the materials which the KRS
>> clearly isn't?
>>>
>>>>>> I think it is the obe he used to plot the alternatives
>>>>>> closest to the that of the KRS.
>>>
>>>>> And you believe him without seeing the _all_ the results?
>>>
>>>> Why not? He's got nothing to gain and everything to lose by lying.
>>>> See http://www.d.umn.edu/geology/people/fsbios/ojakangas.html
>>>
>>> I expected scattergrams. Dissapointing.
>>> But looking at his 'palmares', are you sure
>>> he did what you say he did?
>>>
>> --- snip----
>
>Eric, you are hopeless

I'm never without hope.

But what is it that you think he should have done?



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages