Re: KRS book: Geology

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 00:57:03 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote: 82ajr1t4m3t7s9hplnpoltthj49ee2fsgb@xxxxxxx,
>
>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:04:13 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Stevens wrote: lttir1l884jg3qq3q008a80vl0ddal4jef@xxxxxxx,
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:26:07 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Eric Stevens wrote: 2t8hr1hbq7bub7l1t4pg6itr1agj8qefk2@xxxxxxx,
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2006 01:26:02 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- snip ----
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, I think it is the published scattergram,
>>>>>>>>> and if he did what you say he did, then he
>>>>>>>>> presentend only 'positive' results.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He presented the results closest to that of the KRS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is what I'm saying: only the positive results.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you really want the diagrams for *all* the materials which the
>>>>>> KRS clearly isn't?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think it is the obe he used to plot the alternatives
>>>>>>>>>> closest to the that of the KRS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And you believe him without seeing the _all_ the results?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why not? He's got nothing to gain and everything to lose by
>>>>>>>> lying. See
>>>>>>>> http://www.d.umn.edu/geology/people/fsbios/ojakangas.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I expected scattergrams. Dissapointing.
>>>>>>> But looking at his 'palmares', are you sure
>>>>>>> he did what you say he did?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- snip----
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric, you are hopeless
>>>>
>>>> I'm never without hope.
>>>>
>>>> But what is it that you think he should have done?
>>>
>>> Please reread my previous post on this subject.
>>
>> I still can't make sense of it.
>
>Not even if you read my previous post_s_ on this subject?

It should by now be clear that I can't understand the reasons for your
insistence that Ojakangas should have shown more data points on his
triangle diagram than he did. I'm quite happy to accept that he showed
the coordinates for the composition of the KRS and those North
American Greywackes of a composition closest to that of the KRS. I see
no point in showing the composition of all those very many materials
of a more widely different composition.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... >>>the exact composition of the ink is and therefore we cannot discuss ... >up to supporters of the map to provide that plausible explanation, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... >>the exact composition of the ink is and therefore we cannot discuss ... Without a plausible explanation for *all* its unique features in a 15th ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote: 3g61s1llg9mn7ogpijhuej8nhbdpvuruke@xxxxxxx, ... >>> Reread what I wrote. ... What soil are you talking about? ... >>> I was not talking about the krs. ...
    (sci.archaeology)