Re: The language of the KRS


"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:3llrr1hhq41fa53uc3nogd5tgrjb3muki6@xxxxxxxxxx
>I have been sent a video of an address given by Scott Wolter and ***
> Nielsen at a book-signing on Dec 10-05.
>
> *** Nielsen made an interesting comment. I didn't note the exact
> words but I can loosley paraphrase him as saying that according to
> Henrik Williams 'it is now more difficult to categorise the language
> of the KRS as being from the 19th century than it is to categorise it
> as being from the 14th century'.
>

Why don't you watch the video again (and again and again, if that's what it
takes) and reproduce the exact words, rather than loosely paraphrasing the
source.

Even better, perhaps you can report the "why" behind Nielsen's statement.

> Eric Stevens

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3


.