Re: The language of the KRS

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 07:00:33 -0500, "Steve Marcus"
<smarcus_spamout_@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
>"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:3llrr1hhq41fa53uc3nogd5tgrjb3muki6@xxxxxxxxxx
>>I have been sent a video of an address given by Scott Wolter and ***
>> Nielsen at a book-signing on Dec 10-05.
>>
>> *** Nielsen made an interesting comment. I didn't note the exact
>> words but I can loosley paraphrase him as saying that according to
>> Henrik Williams 'it is now more difficult to categorise the language
>> of the KRS as being from the 19th century than it is to categorise it
>> as being from the 14th century'.
>>
>
>Why don't you watch the video again (and again and again, if that's what it
>takes) and reproduce the exact words, rather than loosely paraphrasing the
>source.

What is the point of exactly quoting someone else's paraphrase?
>
>Even better, perhaps you can report the "why" behind Nielsen's statement.

It wasn't stated, although it might be possible for you to deduce it
after you have read the book.



Eric Stevens

.