Re: The language of the KRS


"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b6ptr19c1pa99l1g0l3k7vejf3fos54v6h@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:58:09 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Steve Marcus wrote: 0Zsvf.60828$4l5.660@dukeread05,
>>
>>> "Eric Stevens" wrote
>>
>>>> I have been sent a video of an address given by Scott Wolter and ***
>>>> Nielsen at a book-signing on Dec 10-05.
>>>>
>>>> *** Nielsen made an interesting comment. I didn't note the exact
>>>> words but I can loosley paraphrase him as saying that according to
>>>> Henrik Williams 'it is now more difficult to categorise the language
>>>> of the KRS as being from the 19th century than it is to categorise it
>>>> as being from the 14th century'.
>>
>>> Why don't you watch the video again (and again and again, if that's
>>> what it takes) and reproduce the exact words, rather than loosely
>>> paraphrasing the source.
>>>
>>> Even better, perhaps you can report the "why" behind Nielsen's
>>> statement.
>>
>>OK, lets skip the language for a moment.
>>Here is the latest:
>>
>>Posted: 12/28/05
>>Evidence said to prove Rune Stone authentic
>>By Rachel Kytonen
>>http://www.isanticountynews.com/2005/December/28runestone.html
>>
>>Some fragments:
>> The heavily-debated inscription carved on the
>> Kensington Runestone [..., is authentic and
>> contains an encoded prayer and a reference to
>> Gral, the medieval spelling of Grail, according to
>> geologist Scott Wolter.
>>
>> In an interview with the NEWS Monday, Dec. 26,
>> Wolter said in the past two weeks it has been
>> determined that within the inscription on the rune
>> stone is probably an encoded prayer for the 10
>> dead men whose apparent demise/deaths is
>> mentioned within the inscription.
>>
>> "At the end of the day what we know is the rune
>> stone is a land claim stone," Wolter said.
>> "Obviously something tragic happened to the 10
>> men on this business venture, but we don't know
>> how they died. . . This information was engraved in
>> the rune stone to tell us what they were doing here
>> . . . and while carving in it the prayer was put in
>> afterwards."
>>
>> The runes and the language of the Kensington
>> Rune Stone are indeed medieval and could have
>> been applied in the 14th century.
>>
>> But after the book came out, Wolter and Nielsen
>> discovered in the inscription a symbol for the "holy
>> spirit," that means "these ten men are with the
>> holy spirit," and in the inscription where it says the
>> men were "fishing," fishing most likely means
>> "preaching."
>>
>> Wolter said it's evident that a preacher probably
>> carved this prayer in the rune stone.
>>
>> "Based on the weathering work we did, it became
>> very clear to me in my mind that the inscription
>> was old and therefore, it must be genuine," Wolter
>> said. "What bothered me was people didn't accept
>> my results. I haven't lost a legal case yet that I
>> have testified at and with all the evidence obtained,
>> I found it surprising people didn't agree with my
>> geologic results."
>>
>>So, unpublished new 'evidence'.
>>That will keep us going.
>
> I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from.

You mean that there's published evidence of "probably" and "most likely"?
>
>
>
> Eric Stevens

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3
>


.

Quantcast