Re: The language of the KRS

On Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:49:21 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote: b6ptr19c1pa99l1g0l3k7vejf3fos54v6h@xxxxxxx,
>
>> "Peter Alaca" wrote:
>
>>> OK, lets skip the language for a moment.
>>> Here is the latest:
>>>
>>> Posted: 12/28/05
>>> Evidence said to prove Rune Stone authentic
>>> By Rachel Kytonen
>>>
>>> Some fragments:
>>> [...]
>>> So, unpublished new 'evidence'.
>>> That will keep us going.
>>
>> I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from.
>
>Oh? Please give us a reference to the paper(s)
>where he published his post-book discoveries,
>and especially in the last ten days.

Please give me a published source which shows that Wolter or Nielsen
have discovered new evidence in the last 10 days.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... >>>(it's a fake) through logical analyses of different types of evidence, ... There certainly is a discernable difference between the lines left by ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Gotland crosses
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote: 9dc1b1t3t46f4dof7frbi62hcthfmfao20@xxxxxxx, ... >>> Outernet Publishing ... Compelling New Evidence is both ... scientific ideology, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >>Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... available evidence points to X conclusion, but there may just be more out ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... > Eric Stevens wrote: fc1vr1p8sl6jrmuotmc0o0f7u50k90dtiv@xxxxxxx, ... Please give us a reference to the paper ... Peter that some new evidence isn't published doesn't mean that it was ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Challenge for naysayers of the Kensington Runestone
    ... >>>Eric like Inger have retracted from open support of Websites ... depending on whose interpretation of the evidence you rely upon, ... Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)