Re: The language of the KRS

I E_Johansson wrote:  pyOvf.42165$d5.198332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

"Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:43bfa224$0$281$dbd4b001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I E_Johansson wrote:  BSMvf.42161$d5.198362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
 > "Peter Alaca"skrev
Eric Stevens wrote:
"Peter Alaca" wrote:
Eric Stevens wrote:
"Peter Alaca" wrote: 

OK, lets skip the language for a moment.
Here is the latest:

Posted: 12/28/05
Evidence said to prove Rune Stone authentic
By Rachel Kytonen

Some fragments:
[...]
So, unpublished new 'evidence'.
That will keep us going.

I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from. 

Oh? Please give us a reference to the paper(s)
where he published his post-book discoveries,
and especially in the last ten days.


Please give me a published source which shows that
Wolter or Nielsen have discovered new evidence in
the last 10 days.

I did. 

Peter that some new evidence isn't published doesn't
mean that it was discovered in the last 10 days.


You are right. It was confused by Eric's invention.
He changed my question about _publication_ in the
last ten days to new _evidence_ in the last ten days.
I don't know if he did that on purpose, or that he
can't read.

My point was what is written in the cited article
on the basis of an interview with Wolter.
    "Wolter said in the past two weeks
     it has been determined that ..."
and
    "But after the book came out, Wolter
     and Nielsen discovered ..."

So, Wolter says they discovered new things
in the previous fortnight. That means that if
they published that, that only could be done
in the days since the interview on 26 december.
Hence the ten days.
I think that is impossible, but given Eric's
    "I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from"
he seems to suggest they did.


From a question I had in July and what I have heard, read or elsewhat
had information about I can see in the interview of 26 december that
they have arrived to a new conclusion/had new information in at least
two essential details. Interesting information fitting the picture
and making the ribbons into a nice rosette. The pieces they stressed
were cistercienser order and the German Knights. Well if we add to
the picture of Ivar Bardson in mid 14th century Norway, The Knights
Templar in 13th and 14th century, The Cistercienser Order in
Scandinavia in 14th century and the German Order in the Baltic,
a marriage between Svantepolk Knutson and a descendant to Birger
Brosa(Folkunga Dynasty) who also were a descendant to King Sverker of
Sweden and her background, some of the more wellknown Bride-run-away
in Swedish History...... it all fits into one and the same box and
the ribbons fits the box.


But, as I understand it, that is in the book
and not discoveries since the publication
of the book.

--
º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... So, unpublished new 'evidence'. ... where he published his post-book discoveries, and especially in the last ten days. ... Wolter or Nielsen have discovered new evidence in the last 10 days. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... >last ten days to new _evidence_ in the last ten days. ... >on the basis of an interview with Wolter. ... where he published his post-book discoveries, ... I take it from your reference above that the basis of your comment ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... Evidence said to prove Rune Stone authentic ... So, unpublished new 'evidence'. ... where he published his post-book discoveries, and especially in the last ten days. ... Wolter or Nielsen have discovered new evidence in the last 10 days. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... > last ten days to new _evidence_ in the last ten days. ... > on the basis of an interview with Wolter. ... > in the days since the interview on 26 december. ... Cistercienser Order in Scandinavia in 14th century and the German Order in ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The language of the KRS
    ... >>> on the basis of an interview with Wolter. ... >> where he published his post-book discoveries, ... >> about unpublished new evidence may be the part of the newspaper ... Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)