Re: The language of the KRS
- From: "I E_Johansson" <inger e.johansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 14:01:36 GMT
"Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:43bfb9cc$0$13130$dbd43001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I E_Johansson wrote: pyOvf.42165$d5.198332@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>
> > "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:43bfa224$0$281$dbd4b001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> I E_Johansson wrote: BSMvf.42161$d5.198362@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> >> > "Peter Alaca"skrev
> >>>> Eric Stevens wrote:
> >>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote:
> >>>>>> Eric Stevens wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote:
> >>
> >>>>>>>> OK, lets skip the language for a moment.
> >>>>>>>> Here is the latest:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Posted: 12/28/05
> >>>>>>>> Evidence said to prove Rune Stone authentic
> >>>>>>>> By Rachel Kytonen
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Some fragments:
> >>>>>>>> [...]
> >>>>>>>> So, unpublished new 'evidence'.
> >>>>>>>> That will keep us going.
> >>
> >>>>>>> I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from.
> >>
> >>>>>> Oh? Please give us a reference to the paper(s)
> >>>>>> where he published his post-book discoveries,
> >>>>>> and especially in the last ten days.
> >>
> >>>>> Please give me a published source which shows that
> >>>>> Wolter or Nielsen have discovered new evidence in
> >>>>> the last 10 days.
> >>
> >>>> I did.
> >>
> >>> Peter that some new evidence isn't published doesn't
> >>> mean that it was discovered in the last 10 days.
> >>
> >> You are right. It was confused by Eric's invention.
> >> He changed my question about _publication_ in the
> >> last ten days to new _evidence_ in the last ten days.
> >> I don't know if he did that on purpose, or that he
> >> can't read.
> >>
> >> My point was what is written in the cited article
> >> on the basis of an interview with Wolter.
> >> "Wolter said in the past two weeks
> >> it has been determined that ..."
> >> and
> >> "But after the book came out, Wolter
> >> and Nielsen discovered ..."
> >>
> >> So, Wolter says they discovered new things
> >> in the previous fortnight. That means that if
> >> they published that, that only could be done
> >> in the days since the interview on 26 december.
> >> Hence the ten days.
> >> I think that is impossible, but given Eric's
> >> "I don't know where you get the 'unpublished' from"
> >> he seems to suggest they did.
> >
> > From a question I had in July and what I have heard, read or elsewhat
> > had information about I can see in the interview of 26 december that
> > they have arrived to a new conclusion/had new information in at least
> > two essential details. Interesting information fitting the picture
> > and making the ribbons into a nice rosette. The pieces they stressed
> > were cistercienser order and the German Knights. Well if we add to
> > the picture of Ivar Bardson in mid 14th century Norway, The Knights
> > Templar in 13th and 14th century, The Cistercienser Order in
> > Scandinavia in 14th century and the German Order in the Baltic,
> > a marriage between Svantepolk Knutson and a descendant to Birger
> > Brosa(Folkunga Dynasty) who also were a descendant to King Sverker of
> > Sweden and her background, some of the more wellknown Bride-run-away
> > in Swedish History...... it all fits into one and the same box and
> > the ribbons fits the box.
> >
>
> But, as I understand it, that is in the book
> and not discoveries since the publication
> of the book.
The link going back to Norway?
The reason why Bohuslän e-dialect fits Gotland-Baltic and why a lot of the
documentation can be found in Östergötland. That is to say the documentation
that aren't in Trondheim/Bergen?
Inger E
>
> --
> º°º°º°º < Peter Alaca > º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°º°
>
>
.
- References:
- The language of the KRS
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: I E_Johansson
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: I E_Johansson
- Re: The language of the KRS
- From: Peter Alaca
- The language of the KRS
- Prev by Date: Re: The language of the KRS
- Next by Date: Re: The language of the KRS
- Previous by thread: Re: The language of the KRS
- Next by thread: Re: The language of the KRS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|