Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:40:45 +1300
On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:40:54 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:
>I E_Johansson wrote: ReNvf.42162$d5.198234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
>> "Peter Alaca"skrev
>>> Eric Stevens wrote:
>>> > "Peter Alaca" wrote:
>>>>> Eric Stevens wrote:
>>>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote:
>>>>>>> Daryl Krupa wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> If anthropogenic acids have been responsible for at least some
>>>>>>>> of the weathering of the Maine tombstones, and have been
>>>>>>>> responsible for their appearance of great age, then perhaps
>>>>>>>> those acids are also responsible for the appearance of great
>>>>>>>> age of some of the surfaces of the KRS.
>
>>>>>>> How about this:
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laila Kitzler Åhfeldt (2002), "Work and Worship -
>>>>>>> Laser Scanner Analysis of Viking Age Rune Stones"
>>>>>>> page 21
>>>
>>>>>> Apart from the fact that the quoted text is very general in nature
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> You mean that Arrhenius and Trotzig
>>>>> say nothing about the KRS?
>>>
>>>>>> ... and applies to rune-texts carved in rock significantly
>>>>>> different from that of the KRS, ...
>>>
>>>>> Are you sure?
>>>
>>>> Granite for the most part.
>>>
>>> "Rune stones were made primarily from
>>> crystalline rocks (i.e. granite and gneiss),
>>> until the end of the 11th century when
>>> sandstone rune stones become common."
>>> [Åhfeldt (2002), page 21]
>>>
>>> And since you stated in another recent reply
>>> to Steve Marcus that
>>> "The question is not weathering of stone
>>> in general but the weathering of biotite in
>>> particular. Biotite is common to both the
>>> KRS and the tombstones."
>>> you must be aware of the fact that biotite is
>>> common in granite and gneiss.
>>> So, what is that significant difference between
>>> the KRS and Scandinavian runestones as far as
>>> natural and artificial weathering is concerned?
>>
>> 1) apart from the Liljestone(1000's century) found in the basement of
>> St Lars Church in Linköping I am not aware of any of the Scandinavian
>> carved stones, runestones or picturestones, who been faced down in
>> same type of soil as KRS has been. A stone out in the open and a
>> stone face down in soil undergo different type of weathering.
>
>Yes, the face of a stone facedown under ground
>is always moist and therefore always under
>influence of possible acidic soil conditions.
Tsk tsk tsk.
pH 7.5 to 8.5 is hardly acid.
>On the other hand are stones in the open 'suffering'
>from algae, lichen and bird droppings.
>But who knows how long the KRS stood or lay in the
>open and how long it was buried?
>
>> 2) The acidwater falling over Scandinavia, especially Sweden,
>> increased from late 1950's to 1990's due to airpollution from England
>> which didn't fall down until it reach Scandinavia. The acidwater did
>> cause tremendous changed erosion on Rock Carvings. That's known.
>> Nothing alike is known from the Minnesota area.
>>
>> 3) Temperatur changes causes as you know a lot of the erosion. While
>> the max and min temperatures aren't that different the sudden changes
>> in Scandinavia due to different type of Weathersituation are
>> completely different. Scandinavia is as you know located east of the
>> Atlantic and close to the coast. Minnesota is inside a large
>> continent. There you can find part of the answer to your question.
>>
>> Inger E
>
>But, despite the fact that I mentioned natural
>weathering in my last reply, we were talking
>about the possible eroding effect of cleaning
>runestones with a steel brush and caustic soda.
All kinds of unbelievable things have been done to the KRS but never
steel brushes or caustic soda as far as I know.
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: I E_Johansson
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- References:
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Daryl Krupa
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: I E_Johansson
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- From: Peter Alaca
- Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- Next by Date: Re: KRS book: Geology
- Previous by thread: Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- Next by thread: Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|