Re: KRS book: Geology

On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:58:24 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote: 7ug0s1p80o5h6bpsoln9tid2himnt9qk0q@xxxxxxx,
>
>> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006 11:35:32 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Stevens wrote: lf3vr1htoq340f07cuuti882prte02jkrp@xxxxxxx,
>>>
>>>> The key data in this case is Ojakangas's opinion as
>>>> to the most likely origin of the greywacke for the KRS.
>>>
>>> And that is precisely the problem here.
>>> You can choose to rely on a specialists opinion,
>>> but that opinion can't be used as evidence.
>>
>> It certainly can be in most english speaking courts, although the
>> expert can expect to be cross-examined in the event of a conflicting
>> opinion from another expert.
>
>There you are then.

If there is no challenge then the opinion is taken as evidence.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: KRS book: Geology
    ... he cannot convince his readers that he is correct if he ... > To convince anybody that your opinion as to the identity of such ... Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS book: Geology
    ... Eric Stevens wrote: ... he cannot convince his readers that he is correct if he ... To convince anybody that your opinion as to the identity of such ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS book: Geology
    ... he cannot convince his readers that he is correct if he ... That speaks pretty "well" for Ojakangas and Wolter. ... >> To convince anybody that your opinion as to the identity of such ... > Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >"Eric Stevens" wrote... ... >on the basis of nothing. ... opinion is not necessarily identical to a conclusion. ... >forward what they would suppose to be an educated opinion based upon what ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS book: Geology
    ... > Eric Stevens wrote: 99mlr1pt0c3rg8c3412t66cp7kge52ih93@xxxxxxx, ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)