Re: Kensington Runestone - Nielsen and Wolters.

On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:20:00 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote: 3g61s1llg9mn7ogpijhuej8nhbdpvuruke@xxxxxxx,
>
>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:33:59 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Eric Stevens wrote: tlp0s1lq56c8r2i3mlq2qk6huupfmfdm0n@xxxxxxx,
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:10:16 +0100, "Peter Alaca" <P.Alaca@xxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Eric Stevens wrote: 2og0s1tn2i5l5gn3p86l12l0i94lqc8fpj@xxxxxxx,
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Peter Alaca" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes, the face of a stone facedown under ground
>>>>>>> is always moist and therefore always under
>>>>>>> influence of possible acidic soil conditions.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Tsk tsk tsk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> pH 7.5 to 8.5 is hardly acid.
>>>>>
>>>>> So?
>>>>> I wrote "_a_ stone" and "_possible_ acidic soil"
>>>>> because we were talking about differences
>>>>> between stones in the open and buried stones.
>>>>> Try to keep up Eric.
>>>>
>>>> If I take your remark at face value, you don't actually know the
>>>> soil pH and hence have been throwing the full range of
>>>> possibilities into the argument. Are you just filling in time?
>>>
>>>
>>> Reread what I wrote. What soil are you talking about?
>>
>> You don't know the pH and you are just filling in time.
>
>I am _wasting_ my time with you.

Everybodies ...
>
>>>>>>> But, despite the fact that I mentioned natural
>>>>>>> weathering in my last reply, we were talking
>>>>>>> about the possible eroding effect of cleaning
>>>>>>> runestones with a steel brush and caustic soda.
>>>>>
>>>>>> All kinds of unbelievable things have been done to
>>>>>> the KRS but never steel brushes or caustic soda as
>>>>>> far as I know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, as far as you know.
>>>>
>>>> And you have no idea at all.
>>>
>>> I was not talking about the krs.
>>
>> But I was. Just parse my sentence to which you responded. So, what did
>> you really think you were saying?
>
>You responded to somthing I said to Inger,
>and that was not about the krs.

"All kinds of unbelievable things have been done to the KRS but never
steel brushes or caustic soda as far as I know." is not about the KRS?

I'm giving up on this. Its obviously pointless.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
    ... >>Eric Stevens wrote: p6kha1t9fmuk6bhsr536sttfoaf8kmmsv0@xxxxxxx, ... What he calls 'trivia' are the facts ... >>> the KRS based on irrelevancies and what people haven't said. ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... > Eric Stevens wrote: ... >> scenes discussion of on going work associated with the KRS. ... > would it be that the email group would decide to invite ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Some of the Logic of KRS discussion
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote: p6kha1t9fmuk6bhsr536sttfoaf8kmmsv0@xxxxxxx, ... What he calls 'trivia' are the facts ... >> the KRS based on irrelevancies and what people haven't said. ... Philip doesn't really need facts and has absolutely no doubt as to ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS book: Geology
    ... >>> potential forgery if there was no history of forgery? ... >on the krs means that it is wriitten by a professional. ... Is it professional to write "Little Red Riding Hood" ... Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Whats So Important About KRS?
    ... >>to the missing Greenland colonists that that the KRS party was searching ... >>runes; all anyone ever said was that they show that the KRS could have ... >>Yet you allegedly remain firmly on the fence regarding authenticity. ... >>> Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast