Re: Just a few thoughts.

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:07:09 GMT,
nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>Apparently on date Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:37:52 GMT, prd <X_header@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>said:
>
>>In sci.archaeology message
>>news:200601161654.k0GGsWSF014360@xxxxxxxxxx by Bruce Scott TOK
>><Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]> . . . :
>>
>>> Phil, I recommend simply ignoring her, and placing somewhat less
>>> emphasis on debating. Add information, discuss with people as
>>> you do, but don't try so hard. If people accuse you of
>>> something just ignore them.
>>
>>You will note that when someone, goes strung out into never-never
>>land on something I state, I generally killfile them within a couple
>>of posts. Inger is in my killfile, so is Hines, so is Lee, Eric goes
>
>Except of course that your killfile is renowned across usenet for not being
>worth a damn as you are the person who reads and posts to all the people you
>claim to have killfiled and produce something like a third of the trash posts
>cluttering up this newsgroup.
>
>*And* you morph to dodge out of other people's killfiles.
>
>But being the arch-kook that you are, neither will you be able to see you are
>the problem and nor will you be able to reduce your repetitive rantingly-long
>replies to the people you earnestly recommend, in dozens of your own posts,
>others should not reply to.

What I find particularly irritating is that many of Philip's replies
do not even address the topic of discussion. And I wish someone would
teach him the proper use of paragraphs in writing.
>
>I would *Like* to be in your kill file, but sadly, when I post, being in your
>kill file means you are obliged to reply - often several times under different
>identities - to my posts, each time demonstrating a combination of arrogant
>assumption of superior knowledge with a depressing evidence of a lack of it.
>
>Then you call whoever points out some of the more evident flaws and
>stupidities, a kook. Because that's what you do, continual kook stuff. Anyone
>who shows you up as a crackpot must be a crackpot. Good logic, Deitker.



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Just a few thoughts.
    ... Inger is in my killfile, so is Hines, so is Lee, Eric goes ... worth a damn as you are the person who reads and posts to all the people you ... replies to the people you earnestly recommend, in dozens of your own posts, ... who shows you up as a crackpot must be a crackpot. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Today
    ... And even an idiot like Inspector Javereau here should be able to figure out that had I been lying about my killfile, I would almost certainly have slipped up by now and mentioned something not in the quoted text, while an idiot with aspirations to imbecility would have noticed that I respond to those I killfile as soon as they change their nyms or use another computer. ... Like when gekko posts under her oh-so-difficult-to-recognize pseudos. ... Josh, are you even capable of not lying? ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Today
    ... So "Stan " ... Josh, are you even capable of not lying? ... you'd not read nor respond to my posts. ... >>> Well, yes, but I didn't killfile him to show contempt. ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: KDE and Gnome
    ... what other people quote from his posts. ... that I'd be better off re-instating my killfile on the loser. ... I think he wants attention from people that don't know ... Sid underscores this by his refusal to substatiate ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Re: Tater Gumfries (Fat Beast) Proven Fraud & Liar, Runs & Hides Like a Smacked-Ass Lit
    ... When are you going to killfile me, Queer BOY? ... Don't believe ANYTHING that Patriot Gaymes posts. ... Best thing you could do is KILLFILE the MALICIOUS LIAR Patriot Gaymes. ... Don't believe ANYTHING that Gandalf Grey posts. ...
    (alt.politics)